Score: 1

"Unworthy"

submission: blob explodes

date: October 19, 2008

Yeap. This thing is unworthy of newgrounds.com. Here's why:
1. There's no preloader.
2. Awful tweening and lack of movement.
3. Too slow.
4. Stale humor.
5. Recycled animations.

Lack skill and effort. Try harder next time.

Score: 7

"Great play"

submission: Easy Way Out

date: August 17, 2008

Smooth animation and smart color choice, but lacked detail to fulfil theme.

Great execution for storyline. Movie length was perfect and every portion engaged in storytelling.

Score: 4

"Sub-par"

submission: Crappy Space Shooter

date: July 1, 2008

Smooth movement and fun-looking graphics. The stage size is a little inappropriate, and the game logic has some flaws.

Score: 0

"Worthless at best"

submission: War in space

date: July 1, 2008

Everything is badly drawn and animated. There's no preloader and replay screens.

It's short, it contains insignificant storyline, and contains many animating flaws.

Score: 0

"Excuses does not grant leeway."

submission: 12 FU's Of Newgrounds

date: May 26, 2008

Criticising in the name of comedy? Never. This is comparable to criticising someone and telling them it's a joke. It's not even funny. Everything has flaws, and almost everyone who goes on the site knows what's wrong with it.

Criticism on Newgrounds famous on Newgrounds? Never. That's like a video on YouTube saying YouTube sucks, or on a Christian site saying Christianity sucks. Just not gonna get it. Numa numa on the other hand, is entertainment.

Doing cliche stuff is not funny at all. Neither is pointing the middle finger at the viewer half the time.

Depicting from the submission description, your ignorance and pride overwhelms your tolerance to criticism. You may object, but pointing it out was as easy as the video points the flaws of a flash hosting site. Congratulations on achieving nothing.